Designing SOCs
That Prioritize Operators, Not Just Tech
Rest here, weary traveler. Much has been written about Security Operations Centers (SOCs)—often generated by AI and lacking real-world insights into designing or improving the physical space of a SOC. If you’re looking for generic advice on cyber security, you can start (here)
Or, if you are working for a giant network infrastructure company like SolarWinds and you are looking for a server password, I would suggest anything but “solarwinds123”.

But if you’re designing or optimizing a SOC, it’s time to think beyond software.
The Evolution of Operational Environments
The environments used to manage organizational risk, monitor data, and respond to real-time incidents have evolved dramatically over the last two decades. What began as isolated surveillance rooms or IT hubs has transformed into comprehensive operational environments, spaces where cybersecurity, physical security, emergency response, and executive decision-making converge.
Modern control environments are no longer just about technology, they’re about visibility, coordination, and the ability to act. Whether it’s a GSOC, a PSOC, or a hybrid command center, the design of these spaces must reflect their purpose: to serve as the operational backbone of the organization.
Cyber security is as important in 2025 as it’s ever been
1636
Cyber attacks globally, per organization per week (30% increase) in Q2 2024.
TOP 5
Industries targeted:
- Education/Research
- Government/Military
- Healthcare
- Communications
- Utilities
44%
Business leaders emphasize the importance of CISOs in translating technical aspects of cybersecurity to CEOs and board members.
Technology vs. People in SOCs
Even the most sophisticated software can’t deliver peak performance if the physical design of the room creates distractions, discomfort, or inefficiencies. Thoughtfully designed workspaces and control room consoles are essential for maintaining operator focus, supporting rapid decision-making, and enhancing situational awareness. This article explores how the physical layout of SOCs, along with the ergonomics and functionality of security consoles, can create an optimized environment for 24/7 operations in Global security operation centers and other mission-critical settings.
From Rooms to Interfaces, lets rethink the Console as a Workflow Tool
The physical layout of a control space is more than an aesthetic concern, it’s a functional interface. Much like a cockpit or a surgical theater, every element in the room should serve a precise purpose and support the operator’s task.
This means designing with intent:
- How information flows
- How lines of sight are maintained
- How quickly an operator can access critical tools or displays
Rethinking the space in terms of workflows rather than furniture layout helps teams avoid costly mistakes—like placing high-priority displays in hard-to-reach areas or misaligning seating with surveillance zones.
Types of Security Operations Centers (SOCs)
Not all SOCs are the same. Depending on their function, the console and room design vary significantly. Here’s a breakdown of the most common types:
- SOC (Security Operations Center): A general term for a facility where security professionals monitor, detect, and respond to cyber or physical security threats.
- GSOC (Global Security Operations Center): A centralized hub for managing and coordinating security operations across multiple regions or global locations.
- NOC (Network Operations Center): A control center focused on monitoring and managing an organization’s network infrastructure to ensure uptime and performance.
- RTCC (Real Time Crime Center): A facility that uses live data, video feeds, and analytics to support law enforcement in responding to crimes as they occur.
- EOC (Emergency Operations Center): A command center where emergency management teams coordinate responses to natural disasters, crises, or large-scale incidents.
- PSOC (Physical Security Operations Center): Focuses on managing physical security systems such as CCTV, access control, and alarm monitoring for facilities or campuses.
- CSOC (Cyber Security Operations Center): A specialized environment dedicated solely to monitoring and responding to cybersecurity threats.
- FSOC (Fusion Security Operations Center): Combines both physical and cyber security functions in a single integrated operations center.
- IOC (Intelligence Operations Center): Focuses on collecting, analyzing, and disseminating intelligence for decision-making, often supporting both security and business objectives.
- TOC (Tactical Operations Center): Common in military or law enforcement contexts, this center coordinates field operations in real time during tactical missions.
- MOC (Maritime Operations Center): Specializes in managing security and operations for ports, vessels, and maritime infrastructure.
- DOC (Dispatch Operations Center): Manages communication and resource allocation for dispatching personnel or resources, often overlapping with emergency and security operations.
- SOCaaS (Security Operations Center as a Service): A cloud-based or outsourced model, where organizations hire third-party providers to monitor and respond to security threats.
- HSOC (Healthcare Security Operations Center): Monitors both physical and cybersecurity threats specific to hospitals and healthcare facilities, ensuring patient safety and data protection.
Regardless of the type, SOC design needs to consider factors such as operator fatigue, technology placement, and ergonomic workstations to ensure smooth 24/7 operations.
The Human Performance Layer
While software and systems do the heavy lifting in most control environments, it’s still the people inside who make the judgment calls. That’s why operator-centered design is key, not just to comfort, but to performance.
Subtle choices, like reducing eye strain, optimizing sightlines, limiting ambient noise, or ensuring proper posture, have compounding effects. Over a 12-hour shift, even a minor distraction or ergonomic misalignment can impact decision-making speed, situational awareness, and stress levels.
Designing for human performance means thinking about things like:
- Cognitive load
- Environmental fatigue
- Muscle memory
- Error reduction
Key Challenges in SOC Design
Operators in PSOCs (Physical SOCs) and Digital SOCs face similar design challenges:
- Long shifts & night rotations
- High-stakes, real-time decision-making
- Multiple screens & complex workflows
Ignoring these challenges results in operator fatigue, slow response times, and a less effective work environment. From this perspective, the design challenges around technology and ergonomic furniture are relevant to both types.
Unique Challenges for Digital SOCs
Following ISO 11064 standards ensures a well-planned control room layout, including:
- Monitor positioning to reduce eye strain.
- Lighting and acoustics to minimize distractions.
- Adjustable control consoles for ergonomic comfort.
- Download our carefully crafted guide to ISO 11064-compliant control room design.
Unique Challenges for PSOCs
Unlike cyber-focused centers, PSOCs often operate in semi-public spaces. This creates additional design considerations like:
- Guard sightlines: Should operators see walkways directly?
- Public interaction: Should surveillance monitors be hidden from visitors?
- Physical security barriers: How does the console placement impact access control?
- Applying Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles can help design PSOCs that enhance security without compromising accessibility.
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED)
Do you want your security guards to have a very short and direct path to confront someone that comes in the door, or do you want to put a desk between the door and the security guard to give them an extra split second of reaction time before a potential physical conflict could occur? In other words, does the space need to be defensible? For more on how the physical design of the space can reduce or prevent crime, see The International CPTED Association (ICA) – Primer in CPTED – What is CPTED?. The principles Natural Surveillance, Territoriality, and Access Control are particularly relevant for the design of PSOCs.
Workstation & Command Console Design in SOCs
A well-designed Security operation center console should:
- Minimize distractions for better focus.
- Ensure proper sightlines for GSOC operators and analysts.
- Support multiple displays without clutter.
- Use ergonomic seating to reduce fatigue.
In these types of PSOC environments, special considerations need to be made for how workstations are set up. The information needs to be displayed in such a way that the operators can interact with the public, see the CCTV and security information that they need to without allowing full view of that same information to the public.
There are also security operation centers where the guardroom isn’t separated from the “public space” by a window or door. Questions about the design and placement of the furniture within the space are even more important when access is less restricted by the architecture.
Each console and environment design should be tailored to the mission—there is no “one-size-fits-all” solution to perfectly marry support products and services to the Security challenges.
Operator-Centric Control Room Design Checklist
Want a fast gut check before your next design review?
This quick-reference list condenses core ISO 11064 principles and ergonomic best practices into a practical checklist for planning and evaluating high-performance control environments.
Human-Centered Design Essentials
- ☐ Adjustable-height consoles to reduce fatigue
- ☐ Clear sightlines to critical screens and teammates
- ☐ Monitor mounts positioned at optimal eye level
- ☐ Anti-glare surfaces and ambient light control
- ☐ Space for walking/stretching without obstructions
Performance & Workflow Support
- ☐ Logical grouping of controls and displays
- ☐ Cable management to reduce clutter and distraction
- ☐ Sound-dampening surfaces to reduce cognitive load
- ☐ Task lighting for precision work
- ☐ Redundant display options for failover scenarios
Wellness & Fatigue Prevention
- ☐ Ergonomic chairs designed for 24/7 use
- ☐ HVAC and radiant panel positioning for comfort
- ☐ Acoustic zoning to reduce background noise
- ☐ Visual zoning to limit screen overload
- ☐ Dedicated quiet or rest zones (if possible)
Need a deeper diagnostic tool?
Download our ISO 11064-aligned Ergonomic Design Matrix, a structured, question-based checklist that helps you evaluate each part of your control room design. It includes yes/no prompts and space to document next steps with your team.
The Biggest SOC Mistake: Leaving Furniture for Last
We joke within our sales team that our biggest competitor for SOC furniture is the folding table. It’s a funny anecdote, but it underlies a real issue for many security environment designers. These environments are often designed for a pre-existing (sometimes repurposed) space; the budget is tight, and there is a limited window of time to make the space operational. When the project is approaching the “go live” date, and the budget is nearly expended, the furniture is often the scope that suffers.

Why? Because Security operation centers are often built in pre-existing spaces, and by the time the project nears completion, the furniture budget is exhausted. The result?
- A makeshift temporary table becomes a permanent fixture
- Poorly positioned screens that lead to eye and neck strain.
- Security teams squeezed into poorly planned spaces that weren’t built with them in mind.
How to Avoid This Mistake
- Consider the design of the space at the earliest possible stage.
- Don’t just focus on the overall space design—take a holistic approach by considering the workstations, technology, and how they integrate within the environment.
- Plan and budget before you start buying things.
- Get advice from industry experts.
Need a Solution tailored to your environment?

- Ergonomic
- Affordable
- Fast lead times
- Aesthetic
- Flexible
- Functional
- Futureproof
- Versatile
Yes, You can have it all.

Evan Turner
Key Account Manager
Evan Turner is a Key Account Manager at Tresco Industries, a leading manufacturer of 24/7-use control room furniture. With over nine years of experience in B2B sales and proposal management, he has worked with Fortune 500 companies to deliver tailored solutions for mission-critical environments. Known for his expertise in control room operations and client-focused approach, Evan helps businesses optimize performance and efficiency with innovative furniture solutions.

Manuel Rivera
Brand Marketing Strategist
Manuel Rivera is a Brand Marketing Strategist at Tresco Consoles, a leading manufacturer of 24/7-use control room furniture. With a background in industrial design and extensive experience in B2B sales, marketing, and customer relationship management, Manuel brings a unique blend of creativity and strategic insight to the team. He is dedicated to delivering innovative solutions that resonate with customers and elevate the Tresco brand in mission-critical environments.